Running Sphere


Cowboy Hazel

Big Changes

I've been thinking about my running a lot lately. My goals, my training, my races. Albany shook things up a bit. I've taken a step back and reevaluated how I want the rest of the year to play out.

Looking at my training log, I've come to realize that I can't accomplish my bigger distance goals if I keep pausing to run (relatively) fast marathons the whole year. I ran just over 280 miles in January but, because of the marathon, only 203 in February. There were 3 weeks of taper followed by a week of recovery. And there were far fewer quality miles within those 203 than were in January's 280. Even now, a week-and-a-half after the race, I'm still not getting 100% quality out on my runs.

My plan for 2010 was to build up some big mileage (at least 3,000 total for the year) and get some ultra running under my belt. I thought a fun way to hit that goal would be to load up the calendar with a bunch of marathons. But, I'm realizing now that marathons aren't all that fun if you're not running your hardest. (Not to mention that traveling out to them all is really expensive.) And it's just not possible to run them all hard.

So, I went through my calendar (now a permanent page with a link up top) and aggressively cut out the marathons that weren't essential. New Jersey and Boston were safe because I was already registered. Leadville and San Francisco both made the cut too because they coincided with trips to visit family that would need to be made anyway (and plus I'm really excited about both those courses). I've long had Leanhorse in my head as the spot for my first ultra and so I'll still plan on heading out to South Dakota for that one.

And, of course, New York is still on the list. But I don't want to jog through NYC. I want to run my heart out. There's no way that I could handle being around that many other people running fast through my city without getting carried away myself. If I couldn't hold it in check in Chicago, how could I possibly expect to here? And, realizing that this could potentially be my last year in the city makes me want to make the race all the more memorable. The only way I can do that is if NYCM is the last big race of the year.

So, the JFK 50 is out. So are Vermont City, Lake Placid, and probably Yonkers. Of course, this means that I'll miss one of my goals for the year (the 10+ marathons/ultras one), but I'm okay with that. I think it's necessary in order to achieve the other, more important goals. I need to focus on what is going to get me to Badwater. Or, more accurately, what is going to get me to the finish line on Mount Whitney. Running a bunch of marathons isn't going to get me there. Building up my miles and running challenging races is.

With that in mind (along with a whole bunch of other things) I've decided to change my plans for Leanhorse from the 50 miler to the 100 miler. It's a gutsy move, certainly not the smartest one, and it might backfire on me. But it's what my instinct is telling me to do. And so I'm doing it.

13 Comments

carpeviam
March 2, 2010, 11:58 pm · Reply
Your eyes are on the ultimate goal: Badwater. It's okay to make some adjustments now in order to properly prepare.
Flo
March 3, 2010, 12:51 am · Reply
Wow wow wow!! Congratulations on the self-reflection and finding a new course of action. You're a smart guy, I'm sure your decisions are the best ones to get you to to the big prize. 100miler? In August? What a great test for Badwater. Way to get your feet wet, young man. ;-)
eliz
March 3, 2010, 1:04 am · Reply
oooooh, for a second there I thought you'd cut NYC! As long as you get to race NY, everything else is fine... The switch to the 100 Leanhorse... yes, gutsy. 3K a year sounds insane!!! I am tired just reading it!
Ewen
March 3, 2010, 9:06 am · Reply
It's the right time to look at the big picture and figure out what you need to do to get there. The 100 mile sounds like a good move. Better than doing lots of average marathons.

I've just finished reading Lisa Tamati's book - Runinng Hot. She had an 'interesting' preparation for Badwater, and had a great support crew. That's one tough race!
Robert James Reese
March 5, 2010, 1:06 am · Reply
I hadn't heard of that one before, but just now added it to my wishlist. Was it a good read?
Julie
March 3, 2010, 6:46 pm · Reply
Oh, God. You were considering Yonkers? Good riddance. They don't even close the streets for that one. You dodged a bullet there.
Robert James Reese
March 5, 2010, 1:07 am · Reply
Hahaha. They didn't close the streets in Albany either, but traffic was never really a problem there. I wasn't thinking Yonkers would be great, I was just thinking it was close and cheap.
Shawn Woodward
March 4, 2010, 12:36 pm · Reply
Your blog is excellent and motivating. Thanks so much for sharing...
Joe Garland
March 4, 2010, 7:05 pm · Reply
Periodic reassessment is always yourself, particularly when you believe something is not fitting into the "Big Picture." Go with what works, get rid of what doesn't.

With the understanding that I've not done one and never intend to do one, it seems to me that ultras are different in kind not just degree from marathons. People who do them always seem to be doing them while people who do marathons are doing one or two a year, that the marathon is the "ultra" in non-mileage terms of combining speed and endurance. You get to 20 running hard and aim to make it through the last 6.21875 with as little deterioration as possible.

Beyond that race-distance, aren't you really just testing endurance? Maybe some speed but the test is to finish.

With that rant, if the goal is to do Badwater, I agree that each of your runs has to fit into that plan in some way, shape, or form. If it means running a bunch of mediocre marathons, so be it. It is a have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too deal.
Robert James Reese
March 5, 2010, 1:12 am · Reply
I agree that an argument could be made that the marathon is the toughest race distance. There is definitely a different approach that is taken to ultra distances beyond the marathon. As you say, the pace becomes less important and the focus shifts from eduring speed to simple edurance. I think that's going to be even more true in the really long stuff (100's, etc.) than in 50s, etc. That's part of why I wanted to make the switch. I have so much trouble keeping my pace under control and all that, but I feel like if I'm lined up at the start of a 100 mile race, the dauntingness of it will help keep me in check.
Joe Garland
March 5, 2010, 1:14 am · Reply
I have to admit, you all surprised me a little with your comments here. I expected criticism of the choice to run the 100. It's reassuring to read comments supporting the decision.
Ewen
March 6, 2010, 9:47 am · Reply
It was very readable. There were also lots of colour photos from her life and various races. It was an eye-opener as to how tough those desert races are. She's TOUGH! Did a hike across the Libyan desert with a very heavy back-pack most of which was bottled water - 2 litres only per day. Compared to that, she said the Marathon Des Sables was easy. Worth reading before you run Badwater.
Robert James Reese
March 6, 2010, 12:28 pm · Reply
Sounds really interesting. It just moved to the top of my wishlist. Thanks for the review.

Leave a Comment

Name
Email
Website
Comment
Name and email are required. Your email will not be published.

If you find a bug or want to make a suggestion, please contact us.
Copyright © 2003-2012, Ink Plant. All Rights Reserved.