Running Sphere


Cowboy Hazel

2010 Brooklyn Half Marathon

Helen & Me at the FinishI ran a 1:22:57 half marathon out in Brooklyn this morning. That 6:19/mile overall pace was good enough for 75th out of 7,006. It was also a new personal best and a NYCM qualifier. The race was far from smooth sailing though.

I really, really didn't want to wake up this morning. Our alarms went off at 4:50 and Helen nearly had to drag me out the door to get me on the subway. My legs felt like crap and I spent much of the ride over whining about how bad of a race I would be running. Plus, I discovered on the way that I had forgotten my Garmin at home. I'm the world's worst pacer even with it, so the idea of running a race "naked" scared the hell out of me.

Despite leaving ridiculously early, we didn't have a lot of extra time when we got to Brooklyn. Luckily, I'd somehow been invited to the V.I.P. tent, so we were at least able to grab some quick breakfast there and didn't have to deal with any of the waiting for the bathroom/baggage line hassles.

I was near the front of the first corral, trying to be as close to gun time as possible to help make math at the mile signs easier. We were off and I just tried to run what I thought was a 6:30 pace. Surprisingly, I was right on, hitting 6:31 the first mile, 13:00 the second, and 19:28 the third (I remember them specifically because I was so surprised at my consistency.) The fourth mile was another 6:30 and left me really struggling. I still hadn't made up my mind completely whether I'd be racing this or merely running it. And, at that point, I threw in the towel and decided to just jog it out. If it was taking me this much effort to maintain 6:30's (slower than the real goal pace), there was no point in making it hurt just to be disappointed.

So, I let up. I relaxed my shoulders and imagined I was slowing down. We were lapping tons of slower runners by this point so it was tough to gauge pace, plus I didn't have my watch which I always rely on. When I hit mile 5 and found that I'd run yet another almost exact 6:30, I was very surprised, to say the least. Still, I didn't try to pick up the pace, just kept it relaxed. Miles 6 and 7 were right at 6:30 pace too and I was feeling way better than I had at the start. I started reevaluating...

As we left the park and began our trip down Ocean Parkway, I decided that I might as well give it shot. I'm halfway through this thing with an okay pace and am feeling pretty good. The weather's okay, let's do this. And so I picked up the pace. At the same time, others around me were fading and it made it seem like I was flying. I'd pick targets off in the distance and catch them, only to spot another and continue the process. It was unreal. I was catching these guys that looked like legitimate runners and passing them like it was nothing.

But it wasn't nothing. I started to hurt around mile 9 and the pain only escalated from there. By mile 11, I was getting dizzy and feeling the start of that same chest cramp again. Still, I was keeping my breathing controlled and trying to look as casual as possible as I kept marching past the other runners. At mile 12 I did the math and realized that if I did sub-6 the last mile, I'd break 1:23. So, I started pushing as hard as I possibly could. There was a guy right in front of me that I was trying to pass, but he wasn't going to make it easy. We dueled down the boardwalk but I never did catch him. I did, however, see that the third digit was still a 2 when I ran under the finish line. Sweet. After we left the park, I didn't get passed a single time and I think I probably picked off close to a hundred runners. There's something to this whole running smart thing...

I didn't have to wait long for Helen. She ran a 1:29:45, beating me in age graded percent yet again. We hung out in the V.I.P. tent for a while eating great food, then took some beers over to the beach and fell asleep on the sand.

You can view the full details of this run in Robert James Reese's running log.

15 Comments

carpeviam
May 22, 2010, 10:46 pm · Reply
You two are speedy. A couple that races together... ;)
carpeviam
May 22, 2010, 11:02 pm · Reply
Weird how a race can evolve, eh? Great job, enjoyed the report.
Daniel
May 23, 2010, 1:51 am · Reply
Sweet race, congratulations. Especially impressive considering you're doing high-mileage weeks with no taper. Damn.

I'm mostly blowing smoke about following your example of running watchless, but, well, your results speak for themselves.

And how'd you get in the VIP tent??
Robert James Reese
May 23, 2010, 11:19 am · Reply
I was one of the first 75 people to register for the race, apparently. They just sent me an email and said that I was invited. Not sure why they do that, but I'm certainly not complaining. It was a nice perk.
Corre
May 23, 2010, 10:15 am · Reply
Missed you guys. Great run! What a fun day.
Sarah
Sarah
May 23, 2010, 10:57 am · Reply
Nice job, Robert! That's an impressive race. I always struggle with whether to go watchless or not. On shorter races, my best times so far have been with a watch but that might be despite the watch telling me my splits. It is helpful when your brain is scrambled enough that you can't really do the math anymore but you can also just write your desired splits and/or your 'watch out, you are going too slow' splits on your arm in Sharpie.
As someone who is a bad pace-keeper, though, having the Garmen on can help you keep the same pace: something that you obviously did not need in this race. I've been wondering, though: how important is it to keep the same pace throughout the race, if you don't normally keep the same pace all the time when you run? Or, should you just try to run at a more even pace when you train?
Robert James Reese
May 23, 2010, 11:24 am · Reply
Both in Boston and yesterday, my pace second half was significantly faster than it was first half. That has made me as the constant pace question too... Like, should I have been running a little faster during the first half since I was leaving so much in the tank? Helen said to me last night that maybe I would have run faster if I had warmed up (so that those first few miles wouldn't have been so tough), but I think that running them faster may have left me with too little later in the race when I was trying to pick it up. I'm sure there's a fine line there somewhere and I don't know exactly where it is.

I think the biggest advantage of having the Garmin comes in the first mile so that you can tell your pace before you get to the first marker. As the race progressed I had a decent idea of how fast I was going, but that first mile I really had no idea. I wouldn't have been surprised if it was anywhere between 6:15 and 6:45, and those are obviously two very different numbers and would have very different effects on the race as a whole.
Joe Garland
May 23, 2010, 1:42 pm · Reply
I like the WTF-moment; it's a nice day, I feel OK, let me just race.

You ran this the way I tend to run HMs. I don't worry much about the warm-up and just take it out relaxed. With a few exceptions I always run negative splits. I think the HM is tough because at, say, 7, you pretty well red-lining it (not 10K-red-lining) and have to hold it for the final six. It's those hard but fast final miles that make me feel like a real racer. But I too sometime wonder if I leave too much in the tank. Since it's not as though I'm loafing it for 12 and going hard the final 1.109375, I just think it's a better approach.

As to the Garmin, on courses without known mile markers I might wear it, but otherwise I stick to my regular watch. You have a good point about getting feedback before the mile 1 mark though.

Also, you guys can tear the strip from the bottom of your numbers.
Robert James Reese
May 23, 2010, 6:00 pm · Reply
It's funny how sometimes these discoveries happen as accidents. I would have never gone out there and run that slow the first 6 miles intentionally, but it seems to have worked well. And, I completely agree with you that the HM is tough because it is such a long sustained stretch at a fast pace. My pace yesterday was only 9 seconds per mile slower than my 10K P.R., but it was more than double the distance.

I wear my Garmin on every run, so switching to a regular watch on race day would probably be more confusing than I'd like, but I'm planning on exerimenting with display options in upcoming races. For instance, in Leadville (where I'll be lucky to run under 4:30:00), I'm going to turn the time completely off so that it doesn't mess with my head and just leave the distance showing.
Morrissey
May 24, 2010, 12:33 pm · Reply
Great race rob! Good to see you along the course. You were steam-rollin' along on the last few miles!
Julie
May 24, 2010, 1:48 pm · Reply
Sounds like you've had a significant bump upwards in fitness. I love when that happens. Nice race.
Robert James Reese
May 26, 2010, 1:04 pm · Reply
Yeah, there was a little bump and it's been a lot of fun. I'm pretty sure it's the extra weekly miles that's doing it.
Ewen
May 25, 2010, 8:24 am · Reply
That's a great result Robert. Not such a great advertisement for Garmins ;) The relaxed early pacing worked perfectly. 82:57 and qualifying for NYC is sweet. I like the Warren St singlet -- better than PPTC or, heaven forbid, Harriers.
Robert James Reese
May 26, 2010, 1:05 pm · Reply
Haha, true on the anti-Garmin advertising.

I like the new Warrent Street singlet too, although I wouldn't want to criticize PPTC too much...
isela
May 25, 2010, 4:34 pm · Reply
Excellent work on your race!

Leave a Comment

Name
Email
Website
Comment
Name and email are required. Your email will not be published.

If you find a bug or want to make a suggestion, please contact us.
Copyright © 2003-2012, Ink Plant. All Rights Reserved.